On my radar this week

Alain Giguère

CROP in the news

Our public studies

Our contents

Our Blog

Welcome to our blog, a creative space for free thinking, ideas and inspiration!

The political climate in Quebec, January 2016

Categories: CROP in the news

Posted on 01-28-16 at 1:50 p.m.

Early 2016: Quebecers are in a better mood

The Liberals’ rise to power at the federal level has had a very positive effect on the mood of Quebecers; it’s being received as a real breath of fresh air. Since the Liberal Party was elected, nearly the majority of Quebecers feel that Quebec is going in the right direction.

The Quebec Liberal Party in good form

This sunny attitude is reflected in provincial politics, as a happy population is less likely to want a change of government and signs regarding the QLP are quite favourable. Two years from the next election, the most important indicator is the satisfaction rate with the provincial government, which is very close to 40% -- a comfortable margin for the Liberals. After a difficult 2015, a year of budget cuts and negotiations with its employees, the QLP is kicking off the year supported by its electoral base.

The PQ is slipping

As for the official opposition, it has lost 8 points in the past two months and is currently at its lowest rating since Pierre-Karl Péladeau’s debut as party leader. Moreover, note that data collection was conducted before the nightmarish last few weeks that the leader of this party has experienced. In the last few days, Mr. Péladeau has been unable to exercise his position as leader of the opposition, as he is entangled in defending his other roles, that is, either his role as controlling shareholder of Quebecor or his role as a celebrity who broadcasts his private life and is suffering setbacks in his love life.

The PQ’s descent benefits the CAQ and Québec Solidaire.

At the federal level: The Liberals are sky-high

Figures for Justin Trudeau’s Liberals are stratospheric. Two out of three Quebecers feel that they are doing a good job and they have the support of half of Quebecers when it comes to voting intentions.

The NDP has an electoral base of 20%, which means it has the support to rebuild when the honeymoon is over for the Liberals.

However, at 11%, the Bloc Québécois has returned to the margins following Gilles Duceppe’s departure.

Click here to see study results in detail (French only)

By CROP

List of winning participants to the Panorama 2015 study

Categories:

Posted on 12-11-14 at 11:42 a.m.

Thank you for participating to this year’s Panorama study on the purchasing habits and the values of Canadians.

Our most sincere congratulations go out to this year’s winners:

Grand prize of $1,500: Monique Rochon

$500 cash prizes: Tony Klokocka
Lilia Kusiak
Patti Smith

$100 cash prizes: Mylène Robert
Jane Pollock
Bev Goodman
Shawn Boulet
Eileen Goertz
William Charles Goucher
Jean Broumwell
Benoît Kuang
Nicole England
Leana Seamans

 

Winners will be notified by phone and by email within two (2) business days following the date of the draw and the prizes will be directly mailed to the home addresses that were indicated to CROP.

Thank you again for your valuable contribution to our study.

Best wishes for 2015 from CROP!

By CROP

List of winning participants to the Panorama study

Categories:

Posted on 01-06-14 at 4:35 p.m.

CROP is announcing the list of winners from those who participated in the pan-Canadian survey on values and habits! The winner of $10,000 in cash is Marilyn Bowman.

Congratulations to all the winners and thanks to all participants!

1. Marilyn Bowman (10 000 $ in cash)

2. Sophie Filiatrault (16GB iPhone 5C valued at $600)

3. Manon Hamelin (16GB iPad with Retina screen valued at $501)

4. Martine Cormier (GoPro Hero 3+ Black edition camera valued at $450)

5. Annie Lacasse (PlayStation 4 console valued at $400)

6. Lorne Semke (10.1" 16GB Galaxy Tab2 tablet computer valued at $350)

7. Maryse Laliberté (16GB iPad minis valued at $330)

8. Stéphane Drouin (16GB iPad minis valued at $330)

9. Ed Hoellwarth (Beats by Dr. Dre Studio Over-Ear Headphones valued at $330)

10. Paul Pettigrew (Beats by Dr. Dre Studio Over-Ear Headphones valued at $330)

11. Barbe Deguire (32 GB 5th generation iPod Touch valued at $300)

CROP will contact all winners in the next few days.

By CROP

Differentiation

Categories: Food for thought

Posted on 12-06-13 at 10 a.m.

Image for Differentiation

Of all the aspects involved in marketing, the most challenging must certainly be differentiation. From in here, as for you out there, it can often seem that brands in some categories are All. The. Same.

 

Take the pickup truck ad - and we do mean The Ad - because there only seems to be one version. Cue the narrator's leather saddle of a voice, deeply intoning "If you're a big hombre who needs to move big stuff, then you need brand model xyz," followed by the proof point (big engine, big this, bigger that). Check 'em out, cowboy:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwC1D8s_-vU (Dodge)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ngOek2J65s (Chevy)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDuOp3Uff9Q (Ford)

 

How does a guy get a voice that leathery?

 

And beer ads? Pretty much the same story. To look at these, you'd think beer brands have one supreme purpose: magically transport the, uh, customer to a sex/fun/party wonderland:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLOfH-WzMsk (Bud Light Platinum)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsqXh9n0rew (Coors Light)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Qy20CksdQk (Budweiser)

 

Bikinis, cheerleaders and flamethrowers optional. Just kidding: they're mandatory.

 

Did you know you can do a lot of stuff with an iPhone? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evhr2ObJXsM

 

And how about with a Blackberry? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxpPXHvykHk

 

Notice the tagline: Built to keep you moving.

 

Meaning: you are very very busy and this brand will help you explore every possibility available to you because...yes. It does a lot of stuff.

 

Differentiating your brand is not about the tone of communication or cultural references. You have Justin Timberlake, I have Beyoncé. That is not differentiation. That is tomayto-tomahto.

 

In order to differentiate itself, a brand needs to tap into different consumer insights and plumb different consumer needs. Sex/Fun/Party in a rock bar and S/F/P in a pool in Miami obviously just address the same core needs, with different party wear.

 

Think of the way beauty products constantly tap into such modern consumer desires such as the "importance of physical beauty," "concern for appearance" and "status." Basically, brands help their consumers exist where it counts, in the eyes of others. Axe has slashed its way to the top of the heap: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nszb0LE2Ngw

 

But one brand zagged where the others zigged. Dove went in the opposite direction: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=litXW91UauE

 

Dove was inspired by more deeply-sourced insights. They heard the silent voices: "I'm a woman, and have a negative body image, but I want to love myself as others around me do." This insight taps into the need for personal development. More specifically, Dove hit emotional touchpoints like "introspection and empathy" and "social learning." The brand has an intimate role, and one that breeds loyalty: to help you be beautiful in your own eyes.

 

The ad may touch you, or it may not. You may watch it sobbing over a box of your favourite tissues, or you may find it condescending.  Regardless, this is a strong example of true differentiation in brand positioning.

 

And for that, much love to Dove.

 

By CROP

How hipsters can help us understand mainstream marketing

Categories: Food for thought

Posted on 11-13-13 at 9:26 a.m.

Image for How hipsters can help us understand mainstream marketing

 

Two fundamentally opposite tensions tug at the core of human nature: the desire to belong to a group, and the desire to express one’s individuality. Take “hipsters”, the urban style-scourge that perfectly expresses this duality: they adhere to a super cool/secret/exclusive fashion code to express their individuality, while all observing the exact same social codes and amassing the same accessories (from fixed-gear bikes to home brewing to vinyl records to skinny jeans to flannel shirts to ye olde moustache wax). Ah, the paradox: I’m so very, very different… just like all of my friends!

 

Go further back into the cultish domain and we can see the very same tension in the history of tattooing. Originally, in Polynesian or Japanese tribes, tattoos served as a rite of passage, as marks of status and rank, symbols of religious and spiritual devotion. It had a social purpose. Nowadays, in Western society, tattoos are a claim to individuality. In the postmodern world tattoos broadcast “How different and unique am I? Just look at the inscrutable Chinese symbol on my lower back.”

 

Brands also need to choose: what is my role? Is it to confer social acceptance, or individuality? And there’s a trick: it’s hard to win on both counts the way the hipsters do.

 

The past decades had been the golden era of Masstige (downward brand extension bringing “prestige” to the masses). Consumers sought social acceptance through “luxury” affordable brands such as Sony or Ralph Lauren. The recipe was simple: you buy the product and you flaunt it. No need for words – the brand itself was evidence of your success. Buy this brand, be culturally superior by aestheticizing and ethicizing the world.

 

Nowadays, consumers are increasingly developing their own personal narratives. The brand’s role is to retool and help the consumer affirm his Individualism in order to exist more fully. To this effect, we can clearly distinguish three methods that help said consumer affirm and express that precious uniqueness.

 

Customization: Car manufacturers have just gotten on board this one. You, the consumer, can choose all the options you want, and the brand will build a car to your unique specifications. Or take another perfect example, from a wholly different medium: the Guardian. The influential UK newspaper printed up two different versions of the edition announcing the birth of future King of England, Prince Baby George: one for Monarchists, with Prince George front-and-center; one for Republicans, minus any mention of the child. Talk about customizing reality according to the audience’s beliefs.

 

Personalization: Tailoring the brand experience to consumer preferences. Look at Amazon, which has made a science of divining your preferences based on an array of information, and adapting to them. But it’s not just New Marketing 101 for the Corporate set. Arcade Fire, Montreal’s globally-hot indie band, used the same premise for the video for We Used To Wait. The song is about nostalgia/love for the teenage years. Type in the postal code for the house you grew up in and Google Street View whisks you to your teenage neighbourhood. It makes the entire immersive experience truly personalized – and moving.

 

Craftization: Here, the brand invites the consumer to bring his own skills and knowledge into the experience, making it an extension of his self-expression. This one is typically attached to domestic hobbies or – yes – crafts, like cooking, interior design or gardening. Magazine and cookbooks are full of examples of this. And yes, the hipsters are here as well, with their (supposedly) prized small-batch craft beer. None of that Budweiser for Mr. Moustachio.

 

So, no, Hipsters are not just annoying. They are a genuine cultural example of the tension between the social and the individual in marketing, and the shifts underway as brands retool. But never mind, they’ll say – it’s all too cool for you.

 

By CROP