On my radar this week

Alain Giguère

CROP in the news

Our public studies

Our contents

Our Blog

Welcome to our blog, a creative space for free thinking, ideas and inspiration!

List of winning participants to the Panorama 2015 study


Posted on 12-11-14 at 11:42 a.m.

Thank you for participating to this year’s Panorama study on the purchasing habits and the values of Canadians.

Our most sincere congratulations go out to this year’s winners:

Grand prize of $1,500: Monique Rochon

$500 cash prizes: Tony Klokocka
Lilia Kusiak
Patti Smith

$100 cash prizes: Mylène Robert
Jane Pollock
Bev Goodman
Shawn Boulet
Eileen Goertz
William Charles Goucher
Jean Broumwell
Benoît Kuang
Nicole England
Leana Seamans


Winners will be notified by phone and by email within two (2) business days following the date of the draw and the prizes will be directly mailed to the home addresses that were indicated to CROP.

Thank you again for your valuable contribution to our study.

Best wishes for 2015 from CROP!


List of winning participants to the Panorama study


Posted on 01-06-14 at 4:35 p.m.

CROP is announcing the list of winners from those who participated in the pan-Canadian survey on values and habits! The winner of $10,000 in cash is Marilyn Bowman.

Congratulations to all the winners and thanks to all participants!

1. Marilyn Bowman (10 000 $ in cash)

2. Sophie Filiatrault (16GB iPhone 5C valued at $600)

3. Manon Hamelin (16GB iPad with Retina screen valued at $501)

4. Martine Cormier (GoPro Hero 3+ Black edition camera valued at $450)

5. Annie Lacasse (PlayStation 4 console valued at $400)

6. Lorne Semke (10.1" 16GB Galaxy Tab2 tablet computer valued at $350)

7. Maryse Laliberté (16GB iPad minis valued at $330)

8. Stéphane Drouin (16GB iPad minis valued at $330)

9. Ed Hoellwarth (Beats by Dr. Dre Studio Over-Ear Headphones valued at $330)

10. Paul Pettigrew (Beats by Dr. Dre Studio Over-Ear Headphones valued at $330)

11. Barbe Deguire (32 GB 5th generation iPod Touch valued at $300)

CROP will contact all winners in the next few days.



Categories: Food for thought

Posted on 12-06-13 at 10 a.m.

Image for Differentiation

Of all the aspects involved in marketing, the most challenging must certainly be differentiation. From in here, as for you out there, it can often seem that brands in some categories are All. The. Same.


Take the pickup truck ad - and we do mean The Ad - because there only seems to be one version. Cue the narrator's leather saddle of a voice, deeply intoning "If you're a big hombre who needs to move big stuff, then you need brand model xyz," followed by the proof point (big engine, big this, bigger that). Check 'em out, cowboy:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwC1D8s_-vU (Dodge)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ngOek2J65s (Chevy)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDuOp3Uff9Q (Ford)


How does a guy get a voice that leathery?


And beer ads? Pretty much the same story. To look at these, you'd think beer brands have one supreme purpose: magically transport the, uh, customer to a sex/fun/party wonderland:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLOfH-WzMsk (Bud Light Platinum)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsqXh9n0rew (Coors Light)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Qy20CksdQk (Budweiser)


Bikinis, cheerleaders and flamethrowers optional. Just kidding: they're mandatory.


Did you know you can do a lot of stuff with an iPhone? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evhr2ObJXsM


And how about with a Blackberry? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxpPXHvykHk


Notice the tagline: Built to keep you moving.


Meaning: you are very very busy and this brand will help you explore every possibility available to you because...yes. It does a lot of stuff.


Differentiating your brand is not about the tone of communication or cultural references. You have Justin Timberlake, I have Beyoncé. That is not differentiation. That is tomayto-tomahto.


In order to differentiate itself, a brand needs to tap into different consumer insights and plumb different consumer needs. Sex/Fun/Party in a rock bar and S/F/P in a pool in Miami obviously just address the same core needs, with different party wear.


Think of the way beauty products constantly tap into such modern consumer desires such as the "importance of physical beauty," "concern for appearance" and "status." Basically, brands help their consumers exist where it counts, in the eyes of others. Axe has slashed its way to the top of the heap: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nszb0LE2Ngw


But one brand zagged where the others zigged. Dove went in the opposite direction: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=litXW91UauE


Dove was inspired by more deeply-sourced insights. They heard the silent voices: "I'm a woman, and have a negative body image, but I want to love myself as others around me do." This insight taps into the need for personal development. More specifically, Dove hit emotional touchpoints like "introspection and empathy" and "social learning." The brand has an intimate role, and one that breeds loyalty: to help you be beautiful in your own eyes.


The ad may touch you, or it may not. You may watch it sobbing over a box of your favourite tissues, or you may find it condescending.  Regardless, this is a strong example of true differentiation in brand positioning.


And for that, much love to Dove.



How hipsters can help us understand mainstream marketing

Categories: Food for thought

Posted on 11-13-13 at 9:26 a.m.

Image for How hipsters can help us understand mainstream marketing


Two fundamentally opposite tensions tug at the core of human nature: the desire to belong to a group, and the desire to express one’s individuality. Take “hipsters”, the urban style-scourge that perfectly expresses this duality: they adhere to a super cool/secret/exclusive fashion code to express their individuality, while all observing the exact same social codes and amassing the same accessories (from fixed-gear bikes to home brewing to vinyl records to skinny jeans to flannel shirts to ye olde moustache wax). Ah, the paradox: I’m so very, very different… just like all of my friends!


Go further back into the cultish domain and we can see the very same tension in the history of tattooing. Originally, in Polynesian or Japanese tribes, tattoos served as a rite of passage, as marks of status and rank, symbols of religious and spiritual devotion. It had a social purpose. Nowadays, in Western society, tattoos are a claim to individuality. In the postmodern world tattoos broadcast “How different and unique am I? Just look at the inscrutable Chinese symbol on my lower back.”


Brands also need to choose: what is my role? Is it to confer social acceptance, or individuality? And there’s a trick: it’s hard to win on both counts the way the hipsters do.


The past decades had been the golden era of Masstige (downward brand extension bringing “prestige” to the masses). Consumers sought social acceptance through “luxury” affordable brands such as Sony or Ralph Lauren. The recipe was simple: you buy the product and you flaunt it. No need for words – the brand itself was evidence of your success. Buy this brand, be culturally superior by aestheticizing and ethicizing the world.


Nowadays, consumers are increasingly developing their own personal narratives. The brand’s role is to retool and help the consumer affirm his Individualism in order to exist more fully. To this effect, we can clearly distinguish three methods that help said consumer affirm and express that precious uniqueness.


Customization: Car manufacturers have just gotten on board this one. You, the consumer, can choose all the options you want, and the brand will build a car to your unique specifications. Or take another perfect example, from a wholly different medium: the Guardian. The influential UK newspaper printed up two different versions of the edition announcing the birth of future King of England, Prince Baby George: one for Monarchists, with Prince George front-and-center; one for Republicans, minus any mention of the child. Talk about customizing reality according to the audience’s beliefs.


Personalization: Tailoring the brand experience to consumer preferences. Look at Amazon, which has made a science of divining your preferences based on an array of information, and adapting to them. But it’s not just New Marketing 101 for the Corporate set. Arcade Fire, Montreal’s globally-hot indie band, used the same premise for the video for We Used To Wait. The song is about nostalgia/love for the teenage years. Type in the postal code for the house you grew up in and Google Street View whisks you to your teenage neighbourhood. It makes the entire immersive experience truly personalized – and moving.


Craftization: Here, the brand invites the consumer to bring his own skills and knowledge into the experience, making it an extension of his self-expression. This one is typically attached to domestic hobbies or – yes – crafts, like cooking, interior design or gardening. Magazine and cookbooks are full of examples of this. And yes, the hipsters are here as well, with their (supposedly) prized small-batch craft beer. None of that Budweiser for Mr. Moustachio.


So, no, Hipsters are not just annoying. They are a genuine cultural example of the tension between the social and the individual in marketing, and the shifts underway as brands retool. But never mind, they’ll say – it’s all too cool for you.



Can Ed Snowden save BlackBerry?

Categories: Food for thought

Posted on 10-22-13 at 11:50 a.m.

Image for Can Ed Snowden save BlackBerry?


It was the jewel of Canadian technology: world-renowned success story RIM and its omnipresent and essential smartphone. Remember your first BlackBerry? Who can forget the pride and giddy tech-joy of sending and receiving emails on a handheld telephone, thumbing the Qwerty keyboard, navigating with the little scroll wheel... Not for nothing was it nicknamed a "Crackberry."


But in recent years, the BlackBerry - and RIM - have fallen through the cracks, and into dark times. As the lightning pace of tech evolution has revved up, RIM faces the daunting challenge of clawing a market space for itself against 800-lb. gorillas Apple and Google. The company has struggled and battled through a major rebranding operation, but the question remains: will it be enough?


In order to survive and prosper, a brand must reach and feed a consumer need. It must distinguish itself from the herd and ensure that those two elements form a rock-solid base to support its business model.


Indeed, in business, as in life, one door closes and another opens... but for opportunity's knock to matter, you have to hear it.  Hey, speaking of listening...


Edward Snowden caused a global shockwave when he revealed to us that the National Security Agency actively monitors, surveils and listens to our communications. More specifically, major US tech companies like Google, Facebook and Apple "get together" with the NSA to provide them the information and data that people send and share.


Is this the proverbial open door? Can BlackBerry take this opportunity and address the need for control over one's private life in order to tap into a consumer need and differentiate itself from the competition?


Our Panorama (Crop's sociocultural monitor) tells us that respondents who prioritize control over their private lives are also wary of huge corporate entities, advertising and a ravenous consumer society. Perfect: that's precisely what BB's competitors represent!


And security? First among handheld devices, BlackBerry is known for its encryption and security, and for that reason, it is ubiquitous in government circles. Barack Obama famously used one during his 2008 presidential campaign. The U.S. Department of Defense even stated it was essential for national security.


There may be a happy marriage here between public and product, to wit: those who value control over their private lives are also attracted to nature, an ecological lifestyle and locally-sourced products. In short, they have a romantic conception of life. Even more crucial for smartphone suppliers, they seek out technologies that allow them to save time and connect with others. Therefore, a market position that banks on ethical consumption linked to a strong brand promise of control over one's private life could be the winning combination.


The BlackBerry brand went from a dominant player to a marginal brand. With its rebranding and Z10 effort, BlackBerry is fighting Samsung, Google and Apple on the terrain of "innovation that offers a lot of possibility". Can the brand win this battle?


If the answer is no, it has to become a niche brand. Niche is viable but marginal is not. The difference is that a niche brand has a strong USP. It remains to be seen if BlackBerry can own security and if control over privacy can viably support a business model.  Even - or especially - with a competitive market like smartphones, you've got to think outside the box.